|
Tuesday, April 14, 1998
Medical Center auditoreum
Present: Alatis, Arend, Bates, D. Betz, P. Betz,
Breall, Brown, Campbell, Cohn, Davis, Fasold, Finkel, Fisher,
Glazer, Goldfrank, Haramati, Jacobs, Kellar,
Kelly, Kopac, Kromer, Lieber, Martire,
McFadden,S.J., Moran Cruz, Morris , Mujal-Leon, Mujica,
Murphy, A. Myers, Noyes , Oakley, O'Connor, Owen, Pinkard, Richardson,
Schwartz, Scribanu, Schuelein, Soudee, Spiegel,
Subramanian, Terrio, Tracy, Viksnins, Vroman, Walsh,S.J.
, Wiesel, Witek,S.J.
Excused: Cole, Cooper, Fink, Nichols, Rameh, von
Arx,S.J.
Absent: Areen, Earth, Byren, Cohan, DaSilva, Dover, Dretchen,
Ferdows, Fekrat, Fort, Gallucci, Gerli, Haft, Harter, Hirsh, Lawton,S.J,
K. Myers, McCabe, Nelson, Rothstein, Sara,S.J., Stent,
Wallace, Walters, Wasserstrom, Weidenbruch,
Wientzen, Young
Guest: Father O'Donovan; Liane Nomura (President, Student
Bar Association); Kathleen Burns (Center for Australian
& New Zealand Studies).
1. Minutes of the previous meeting will be approved at
the next meeting.
2. Law Center
Dick Bates announced that Father O'Donovan,
Jack Murphy and a representative of the Student Bar Association
would speak about the situation at the Law Center.
Father O'Donovan stressed that while
a public meeting is not a forum for making decisions, he hoped
to learn from this meeting. He has already heard reactions from
many faculty and students. He will also be meeting with the Law
faculty April 15.
Expressing gratitude for
Judy Areen's service, Father O' Donovan nonetheless
stated that there should be turnover in leadership.
This decision is not "an attack on three-campus budgeting."
Father O'Donovan also expressed his regret at not having consulted
the Law faculty prior to his decision.
Jack Murphy described learning
on April 8 that the Dean would not be renewed. The faculty
met promptly the next day to draft a letter to Father O'Donovan.
Judy Areen, personally, is not the issue. Many people have
spoken out to support her. The greatest problem here has
been the process. Money is, however, another issue especially
in the context of the Medical Center with its acute problems and
history of mismanagement.
Jack Murphy stressed that Georgetown
is a community and that the Law Center will be glad to help financially
when they are consulted candidly about problems and when there
is honest and open discussion. Such discussion has been
lacking in recent years.
Despite rumors, Medical
funds have never, in Murphy's experience, supported
Law. But now many Law dollars are being targeted to
support Medicine. Both Law and the College are exemplary
schools and should be protected.
Dick Bates has reestablished the Budget
and Finance Committee which has been examining the situation.
The Committee helped forestall a cut in operating budgets of Law
and the Main Campus. Jack Murphy expressed hope that further funds
targeted might be restored, There are also threats of centralized
decision making in other areas that have`been handled by separate
campuses, All schools should cooperate to preserve their
campuses.
Liane Nomura spoke on behalf of' the
Student Bar Association. She described the large student turnout,
over 600 students, who met during a holiday weekend to express
concern over the decision to terminate Judy Areen. Student
groups are organizing petitions and a movement to withhold contributors'
funds pending review of the decision.
Miss Nomura cited the many advantages Judy
Areen has brought to Georgetown in terms of fund raising and improved
facilities.
Dick Bates opened the floor to discussion.
Bob Oakley noted Father O'Donovan's
statement that he was here to learn and asked how that related
to the Washington Post statement that he would not change his
mind. Father O'Donovan said he would listen, but Sherman Cohn
asked if this was a matter of placating the faculty.
David Goldfrank asked for justification
of the decision. but Father O'Donovan declined to comment on reasons.
Father O'Donovan also denied the interpretations in the Post that
this was a matter of accessing money from the Law Center.
Asked whether Medical faculty were still part
of the University, Father O'Donovan said of course they were despite
pressure to terminate them.
Dorothy Brown asked about process. How
should such a decision be made? Father O'Donovan said the
three-budget structure was not under attack but that if it were,
this should be discussed. Before the decision about Judy Areen,
he asked for input from students and faculty.
Wayne Davis followed David Goldfrank's question
asking what attributes in a dean were being sought that justified
a change. David Goldfrank cited Areen's popularity. Still, Father
O'Donovan declined to discuss reasons. David Goldfrank cited the
atmosphere of crisis this has engendered.
Paul Betz cited situations in the past
where faculty objected to administrative decisions. He noted
that some confidentiality must be maintained but stressed that
this need not preclude consultation with selected faculty representatives.
At least the faculty representatives could assure the rest of
the faculty that adequate reasons exist.
Father O'Donovan said this might be valid
and lack of consultation is "careless of faculty. "
But in response to a question he described the current governance
of the Medical Campus as "appropriate." Charles Keely stressed
.that there was a pattern of ignoring faculty and that it should
be changed.
Mark Smulson asked whether Medical faculty
had tenure on one campus or at the University. Sam Wiesel
said tenure was being defined differently at the Medical School.
In response to a question about the
message this sent about the employment of women, Father O'Donovan
stressed support for women's role at Georgetown. John Hirsh
asked what other personnel cuts might be coming, but Father O'Donovan
would not comment.
Father O'Donovan reported cautious progress
in turning Medical problems around. Asked what improvements
he sought for Law, he cited greater student aid and faculty support.
Sherman Cohn cited Father O'Donovan's
past praises of Areen which make the present decision seem "irrational"
or an arbitrary exercise of power. He said, "This is a question
of your integrity too, and of our belief in you.. The damage done..
is tremendous... There must be some good reason." Father O'Donovan
replied that he did not feel he was being irrational but still
declined to give reasons.
Leona Fisher deplored the lack of process.
Was there some alternative process? or was this a subjective decision?
This undermines the ideas of Centered Pluralism. Father
O'Donovan said this was not a whim and that he had discussed it
with people both in and out of Georgetown.
Wayne Davis said this was no mere personnel
decision. There should be some statement of a vision for
the School. Again, Father O'Donovan declined to give reasons.
Wayne Davis proposed a resolution urging
Father O'Donovan to reconsider.
RESOLUTION: In recognition of her reputation for academic
distinction and administrative excellence, of her leadership in
moving the Law Center into the top rank, and of her support among
the Law Center faculty, students and alumni, the
Faculty Senate urges the President to
reconsider his decision not to renew Judith Areen for an additional
term as Dean and Executive Vice President for the Law Center.
There was a call for a written ballot on the resolution.
The resolution was approved: 45 yes, 1 no, 2 abstentions.
Leona Fisher called for a reaffirmation of
process. Dick Bates suggested the Senate study this.
Paul Bets felt the present meeting had already communicated this
need to Father O'Donovan. Susan Vroman spoke of great outrage
among the faculty and said the point should be driven home more
strongly. Jack Murphy said the meeting had well conveyed
the faculty's feelings, but that the Law faculty will continue
"for the long haul."
Wayne Davis suggested a resolution stating
faculty outrage. Colin Campbell noted that similar outrage had
not accompanied a similar change at the Medical Center.
This is, however, a "pervasive management style" at
the University.
Jo Ann Moran Cruz suggested setting a time
frame for a response from Father O'Donovan. Suggestions
were made to schedule a meeting.
A voice vote overwhelmingly endorsed conveying
the results of the Senate' s resolution to Father O'Donovan.
Ellen Henderson announced that the group of women faculty she
heads will also be writing to Father O'Donovan and perhaps to
the Board of Directors.
The resolution was passed by a vote
of Senators. Jo Ann Moran Curt asked for a further endorsement
from the numerous visitors. The Senators present unanimously endorsed
this. Among visitors there were: 25 yes, none opposed and
2 abstentions.
Dick Bates announced that
the Senate would meet in approximately
two weeks to discuss Father O'Donovan's response.
3. Medical Center
Sam Wiesel affirmed the continuance of three-campus budgeting.
But he cited the excessive volatility of revenues on his campus
where payments from insurance plans have dropped from about 60%
to about 25%. He suggested that the proposed "faculty buy-out
plan" will give an option to those who do not wish to work in
the newly restricted circumstances.
Mark Smulson clarified that this is being
offered to all Medical faculty. Dr. Wiesel said federal rules
compel offering the same options to all. Some 10 to 15 people
have already accepted buy-outs. These will be funded from
the Medical budget but should pay for itself. Sherman Cohn
asked whether these people would be replaced at lower cost.
Dr. Wiesel said most would not. Dick Bates said he had been
unable to compute how this would help the Medical deficit.
Meanwhile, it may cripple some programs. Does this not also
have to be overseen by a third party? Dr. Wiesel replied
that this is only one of a long list of economy measures. There
was some debate about the requirement for oversight by a third
party.
Colin Campbell asked what deficit was now
anticipated. This year, about $25 million; next year
it is hoped it will be under $20 million. Dr. Wiesel hoped it
would be revenue neutral by 2000. Mark Smulson referred to Medical
support of central administration in the past. Dr. Wiesel
said he did have partial records of this. Could this be paid back?
This is up to Father O'Donovan. Wayne Davis cited numbers
from Nicole Mandeville that are supposed to be cumulative.
Dr. Wiesel said he was not sure the record was yet clear.
Richard Schwartz said his understanding was
that the only transfer had been to fund the positions of O.B.
Hardison and Anthony Hecht. He asked what other charges
could be documented.
Mark Smulson cited a $20 million fund that
Tim Mealy had asked to use for undocumented expenses.
Another proposal for
Compensation Standards has been circulated at
the Medical Center. This will require cuts this year.
Dr. Wiesel advocated an open statement of how salaries would be
calculated. 'Arbitrary allocations by chairmen should not
be tolerated. Faculty should discuss appropriate
calculations their proposals should be reviewed by the administration.
A discussion in Pharmacology was described
as excluding some areas of activity. Dr. Wiesel said departments
might wish to use varied formulae. He asked for suggestions
of how to fund such things as graduate teaching and service that
are not generating revenue. The question was thus raised
of how administrators are paid. Dr. Wiesel replied that
the numbers of administrators were low at Georgetown and that
salaries are set at competitive market levels.
About $2 million was spent last year
for consultants on how to balance the budget. Meanwhile,
many other things go unfunded. There are also about six full-time
attorneys and other legal consultants impacting the budget at
the Medical Center.
Mark Smulson reviewed levels of Medical
tuition and suggested that it could be raised. It will be
raised this year: 5% for continuing and 10% for new students.
Back to the top
|